To create your free account, please enter your email address and password below. Please ensure your email is correct as you will recieve a validation email before you can login.

Email:
Nickname:
Password:
Confirm Password:
Weekly newsletter:
Daily newsletter:

To log in to your account, please enter your email address and password below:

Email:
Password:
Forgot your password?

To reset your password, please enter your email address below and we will send you a link to reset it.

Email:
Submitted by Gwynne Dixon on October 14 2010 - 16:08

EA's controversial shooter may not be the most original game in town, but it certainly is good...

Let's not beat around the bush, Medal of Honor is a lot like Infinity Ward's Modern Warfare games. To claim that it isn't would be like saying that Jedward look kind of alike. There's the heavily directed gameplay with its grand set-pieces, the complementary gunner level (an Apache Gunship in Medal of Honor's case), some long-range sniping a la Zakhaev in Modern Warfare, tightly controlled stealth sections led by a Captain Price-style character ('Dusty' in MoH), the 'feathering' system for aiming that was made famous by Call of Duty, and a single-player campaign that struggles to top six hours in length.

EA's Danger Close studio has clearly been following the Infinity Ward blueprints very carefully indeed, and you can criticise the developer for ripping off Modern Warfare if you like; you can suggest that they're just trying to cynically cash-in on the success of a rival series. You'd be missing an important point though: regardless of whether or not Medal of Honor plays like a bit of a clone at times, it still plays like a very good game nonetheless. What do we have to complain about as gamers? 'How appalling! There are now two brilliant modern combat shooters for me to sink my teeth into. How dare EA offer me this kind of choice and additional enjoyment of the FPS genre!'

Unlike Dante's Inferno, which felt like a cheap God of War knock-off with outdated gameplay and visuals, Medal of Honor at least plays out like a very expensive knock-off. It's obviously been deeply researched, the cinematics are of the highest standard for the genre, while the gameplay itself is both enriching and immersive of the game world. You couldn't really ask for more from a campaign really. Much like Modern Warfare 1 & 2, Medal of Honor may offer a very short campaign, but at least that campaign pulls together six of the finest gameplaying hours that you're likely to experience anywhere else. It's a case of quality over quantity again and, to be honest, we're kind of glad that six hours is fast becoming the standard length for modern combat shooters. In many ways it's a lot more preferable to 12 hours that are painfully drawn out and effectively dismantle any semblance of a cogent storyline.

The design is solid all-round as well and, in some places, it does a better job than any other shooter out there. Take your AI team-mates, for example, who actually manage to help you out by killing the enemy and taking cover in sensible positions. Who'd have thought it would be possible? And it's not scripted either. For a squad system of its kind, which is entirely AI directed, we're racking our brains to recall one that's quite as good. Because you play as a range of characters in Medal of Honor (another Modern Warfare knock-off) who are constantly following orders from superior officers, making those superiors actually capable of fighting beside you believably makes the whole experience that bit more engaging.

If there are criticisms of Danger Close's single-player component for Medal of Honor (beyond the lack of originality of course), then the most significant of them are related to annoying technical issues. Medal of Honor isn't as smoothly optimised as it could be, which leads to the occasional framerate stutter or high resolution textures struggling to load-in at close range. One particular mission starts off with a goat directly in front of your face and, when the high res texture struggles to load in for a second, the remaining low res goat is genuinely alarming in all its demonic facelessness. Still, there are other technical achievements in the game that are particularly impressive, such as the audible effect of silenced bullets ricocheting off distant buildings with a "tak" sound and sending out echoes across the landscape - that's the sign of some truly obsessed sound engineers.

When it comes to Medal of Honor's multiplayer, EA has made no bones of the fact that it's developed by a completely different studio (EA DICE) and may lack continuity with the single-player as a result. Somewhat surprisingly, the two different game types actually feel closer to each other than we'd expected. It's DICE's decision not to opt for perks or killcams - which were present in Bad Company 2 - that makes Medal of Honor more tuned towards the FPS purist. A steadfast focus on team-based modes instead of all-out deathmatches also adds to the authenticity of the multiplayer, which is one of the finer points that stays with you from the single-player as well.

Danger Close has focused on telling an authentic soldier's story with Medal of Honor - one that actually manages to be genuinely touching at times. Similarly, DICE has focussed on bringing this authentic feel over into the multiplayer. With the absence of gamey perks and killcams, MoH's upgrade tree focuses intently on the technical aspects of its weapons instead, such as their barrel slots and sights. It may seem like a bit of a step backwards at first; a bit plain perhaps, but you soon realise why it's there. Despite the gaminess of DICE's multiplayer at times, with its +10 XP icons that pop-up from the body of each successfully killed enemy, it's still more of a pure shooting experience than its competitors, unfettered by RPG-style class bonuses or the addictive chimes of a fruit machine.

Killstreak rewards or, in Medal of Honor's case, Support Actions are the only conventional bonus type that DICE has decided to include. Again though, they're not quite as off-the-hook as what you might find in Modern Warfare 2. Supporting airstrikes or mortar fire, combined with defensive rewards such as improved ammo or extra health, do give you something to play towards and encourage a cautious approach while avoiding silly deaths.  However, relatively speaking these rewards have been downplayed somewhat and won't overdose the gameplay quite as much as a circling Pave Low or AC-130 strike, for example.  Instead, the stress is placed squarely on infantry-based conflict.

Beyond this, DICE's Frostbite engine with its unmistakably destructible environments serves well here (albeit not as impressively as in Bad Company 2) while Battlefield fans will be glad to hear that MoH's modes are a mix of objective based matches in the 'Rush' style, a Conquest-type mode, and the standard team deathmatch. There's more immediacy to the combat than you'd typically find in a Battlefield game though, delivered through tighter maps and swifter deaths. The pace is faster as a result and, once again, this places Medal of Honor much further into Modern Warfare territory than DICE has typically strayed. That said, MoH isn't without the occasional original idea, such as a Skill Level stat that increases when you kill players of a higher skill or decreases when you're felled by a noob.

And the content doesn't end there either. A 'Tier 1' tab in Medal of Honor's single-player component opens up a wealth of ranking boards for the 10 levels featured in the campaign. Players can attempt to place themselves on these boards through a number of criteria, from the amount of headshots achieved on one level to the completion speed of another, while a 'Par Time' for each level then unlocks medal awards for your profile.

If you wish to link to this article, here's a permalink to this page:

  • Graphics: 89%
     
  • Sound: 93%
     
  • Gameplay: 93%
     
  • Originality: 72%
     
  • Longevity: 90%
     
Overall Score: 8/10
Really, the biggest thing letting down Medal of Honor is its lack of originality. This may irk the discerning gamer, who's concerned that the art form is being strangled by disreputable franchise clones, but if you're the sort of gamer who couldn't give two hoots then you'll find one of the best shooters of the year in Medal of Honor.

Comment

Sign Up and Post with a Profile

Join TVG for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member. You can still post anonymously.

Log in using Facebook

Respect Other Members

Please respect other users, post wisely and avoid flaming... Terms & Conditions

 

Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next
User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Fri 05th Nov 2010 12:13, Post No: 61

Further to my previous comments on the 19th October, I've noted that HMV is also offering Black Ops for only £7.99 with the trade in of MoH. I'll be taking full advantage of that offer, as losing £7.99 on the game is far less annoying than losing almost £40.

 

(I wonder which of the main characters in Black Ops they'll be killing off, though) ;-)


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Tue 02nd Nov 2010 14:07, Post No: 60

Digital Tarmac has done there review on Medal of Honor Check it out!


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Sat 30th Oct 2010 23:38, Post No: 59

Post 40 - its a forum about a game, who gives a [#@!?] how people spell,get over it..
spell checkers are about as annoying as the fan boys on here


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Fri 29th Oct 2010 11:26, Post No: 58

been on the mp for days,not touched anything else


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Fri 29th Oct 2010 11:04, Post No: 57

wee wee hahaha


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Fri 29th Oct 2010 10:58, Post No: 56

Nino Figjam I suggest you remove your shades and look again at the graphics! the chopper gunner level is fantastic!.

Man im I glad I dont listen to people like you! phew,And you smell of wee wee


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Sun 24th Oct 2010 21:53, Post No: 55

For UK customers, my local Gamestation is offering a guarranteed money off deal on Black ops for trading MoH in at time of purchase so thats what Il be doing. I imagine all Gamestation stores will be doing the same. I only wish Id not bothered paying 40quid for this. Greap SP but way too short. And the MP is just a rehashed BC2 but without some of the smarter ideas. Left me too skint to afford New Vegas so Im pretty annoyed at myself.

 

6/10


By: Nino Figjam

Added:Sun 24th Oct 2010 01:21, Post No: 54

DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY!!!

This game is not worth too much of my time to rate so I'll be brief. DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY!!! I completed this game on the hardest difficulty in just over 4 hours. Graphics are poor, gameplay is average, AI is pathetic, Multiplayer is better than single player, but multiplayer gameplay could be compared to the original Halo, there is nothing new or exiting about this game. It is extremely over priced for such a pathetic attempt at a FPS. Knowing what I know now, If I saw this game on the shelf with $10 on it, I would complain about being over charged. Spare yourselves the grief and wait for COD7 at least they know how to make FPS games.


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Thu 21st Oct 2010 10:04, Post No: 53

8 out of 10. Sorry ..No. The game is not at all worth that. 6/7 at best. Why...because it's the same as before as before as before as before.

All this type of game does is follow a path laid down by all the FPS games in last few years or so. MW was practically copied by MW2 in most respects but failed on the multiplayer section for me by not using dedi servers (Yes I am a PC Gamer) These games are single players with tacked on Multi games unlike the Battlefield series where it is the other way around.

MOH has basically done the same thing. Yes it looks lovely, yes the sound is good but it's just too predictable.

The multi experience in my mind is also a joke. It's basically camp in a darkened or covered spot and keep shooting at movement till someone gets a lucky shot in and then respawn and find another spot to do the same. This multi player would have been so much better with larger map.

The next one will be Black Ops and it will be the same again..you know it will.


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Tue 19th Oct 2010 16:39, Post No: 52

Thanks for the helpful review. I wish I'd read it before forking out near £40 for the game. Let's see: £40 divided by 5 hours of gameplay = £8 per hour. I'm fairly certain you could get a better-than-average hooker for less than that in Amsterdam...

 

Seriously, though, the gameplay was very, very good, and at times I was so immersed in the unfolding drama that I sat there with sweaty palms wondering where the bloody hell my air support was. When the game abruptly ended (*SPOILER ALERT* with another MW2 rip-off involving the killing-off of a leading character), I was genuinely confused and waiting for the next chapter to start.

I'm not particularly interested in extending the play time with multiplayer, since I get that particular fix with MW2, so if you're like me, you'll rather wait to do a game swap with a slightly disappointed mate.


Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next