To create your free account, please enter your email address and password below. Please ensure your email is correct as you will recieve a validation email before you can login.
To log in to your account, please enter your email address and password below:
To reset your password, please enter your email address below and we will send you a link to reset it.
The coalition government's Defense Secretary, Liam Fox wants a retailer "ban" on "shocking" Medal of Honor game...
The Defense Secretary, Liam Fox has spoken out about EA's controversial Medal of Honor game, calling it "un-British", "tasteless", and "shocking" while calling on UK retailers to "ban" the game when it comes to market this October.
According to a report on page 3 of yesterday's Sunday Times, Dr. Fox (pictured right) wants retailers to "show their support for the armed forces by banning it," and was quick to espouse his anger at the game for allowing players to take the role of Taliban insurgents during the current War in Afghanistan.
"It's shocking that someone would think it acceptable to recreate the acts of the Taliban. At the hands of the Taliban, children have lost fathers and wives have lost husbands," he said.
"I am disgusted and angry," Dr. Fox continued. "It's hard to believe any citizen of our country would wish to but such a thoroughly un-British game. I would urge retailers to show their support for our armed forces and ban this tasteless product."
The offending material in question takes place in the multiplayer component of Medal of Honor, which is being developed by EA DICE and had a closed beta earlier this year. In the beta, gamers were able to play as either US Tier 1 Operators or members of the Taliban in the two team-based multiplayer modes that were on offer ('Team Assault' and 'Mission').
TVG first reported on this controversial issue when it was bought up on the Fox network's 'Fox & Friends' show on US television just over a week ago. An EA spokesperson from the US commented at the time, saying:
"Medal of Honor is set in today's War, putting players in the boots of today's soldier . . . We give gamers the opportunity to play both sides. Most of us have been doing this since we were seven. If someone's the cop, someone's got to be the robber, someone's got to be the pirate and someone's got to be the alien. In Medal of Honor multiplayer, someone's got to be the Taliban."
Update:
The government Department for Culture, Media and Sport has now issued a statement on Dr. Fox's comments and how they relate to the 18 rating that has already been issued to Medal of Honor by UK ratings board, the BBFC.
"Dr. Fox was expressing a personal view and we understand why some people might find the subject matter of the game offensive.
"There is a ratings system in place which exists to categorise games appropriately, in this case the game in question is rated 18 so should only be sold to, and played by, adults.
"There is a clear choice for consumers which they can exercise when making decisions about purchasing video games."
Thanks, Eurogamer.
Update 2:
We've now received an e-mail from EA's UK office with the following comment attributed to an EA spokesperson:
"Medal of Honor is a highly authentic depiction of the soldier's experience in Afghanistan - matching US forces against the Taliban in today's war.
"Multi-player combat is a long-standing, common and popular feature of videogames. In multi-player, teams assume the identities of combatants on both sides of the conflict. Many popular videogames allow players to assume the identity of enemies including Nazis and terrorists. In the multi-player levels of Medal of Honor, teams will assume the identity of both US forces and the Taliban.
"The Sunday Times story on Medal of Honor contains inaccuracies. For one, Medal of Honor does not allow players to kill British soldiers. British troops do not feature in the game."
If you wish to link to this article, here's a permalink to this page:




Click here to Subscribe to this RSS Feed







Comment
Sign Up and Post with a Profile
Join TVG for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member. You can still post anonymously.
Log in using Facebook
Respect Other Members
Please respect other users, post wisely and avoid flaming... Terms & Conditions
Added:Fri 05th Nov 2010 12:13, Post No: 61
Further to my previous comments on the 19th October, I've noted that HMV is also offering Black Ops for only £7.99 with the trade in of MoH. I'll be taking full advantage of that offer, as losing £7.99 on the game is far less annoying than losing almost £40.
(I wonder which of the main characters in Black Ops they'll be killing off, though) ;-)
Added:Tue 02nd Nov 2010 14:07, Post No: 60
Digital Tarmac has done there review on Medal of Honor Check it out!
Added:Sat 30th Oct 2010 23:38, Post No: 59
Post 40 - its a forum about a game, who gives a [#@!?] how people spell,get over it..
spell checkers are about as annoying as the fan boys on here
Added:Fri 29th Oct 2010 11:26, Post No: 58
been on the mp for days,not touched anything else
Added:Fri 29th Oct 2010 11:04, Post No: 57
wee wee hahaha
Added:Fri 29th Oct 2010 10:58, Post No: 56
Nino Figjam I suggest you remove your shades and look again at the graphics! the chopper gunner level is fantastic!.
Man im I glad I dont listen to people like you! phew,And you smell of wee wee
Added:Sun 24th Oct 2010 21:53, Post No: 55
For UK customers, my local Gamestation is offering a guarranteed money off deal on Black ops for trading MoH in at time of purchase so thats what Il be doing. I imagine all Gamestation stores will be doing the same. I only wish Id not bothered paying 40quid for this. Greap SP but way too short. And the MP is just a rehashed BC2 but without some of the smarter ideas. Left me too skint to afford New Vegas so Im pretty annoyed at myself.
6/10
Added:Sun 24th Oct 2010 01:21, Post No: 54
DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY!!!
This game is not worth too much of my time to rate so I'll be brief. DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY!!! I completed this game on the hardest difficulty in just over 4 hours. Graphics are poor, gameplay is average, AI is pathetic, Multiplayer is better than single player, but multiplayer gameplay could be compared to the original Halo, there is nothing new or exiting about this game. It is extremely over priced for such a pathetic attempt at a FPS. Knowing what I know now, If I saw this game on the shelf with $10 on it, I would complain about being over charged. Spare yourselves the grief and wait for COD7 at least they know how to make FPS games.
Added:Thu 21st Oct 2010 10:04, Post No: 53
8 out of 10. Sorry ..No. The game is not at all worth that. 6/7 at best. Why...because it's the same as before as before as before as before.
All this type of game does is follow a path laid down by all the FPS games in last few years or so. MW was practically copied by MW2 in most respects but failed on the multiplayer section for me by not using dedi servers (Yes I am a PC Gamer) These games are single players with tacked on Multi games unlike the Battlefield series where it is the other way around.
MOH has basically done the same thing. Yes it looks lovely, yes the sound is good but it's just too predictable.
The multi experience in my mind is also a joke. It's basically camp in a darkened or covered spot and keep shooting at movement till someone gets a lucky shot in and then respawn and find another spot to do the same. This multi player would have been so much better with larger map.
The next one will be Black Ops and it will be the same again..you know it will.
Added:Tue 19th Oct 2010 16:39, Post No: 52
Thanks for the helpful review. I wish I'd read it before forking out near £40 for the game. Let's see: £40 divided by 5 hours of gameplay = £8 per hour. I'm fairly certain you could get a better-than-average hooker for less than that in Amsterdam...
Seriously, though, the gameplay was very, very good, and at times I was so immersed in the unfolding drama that I sat there with sweaty palms wondering where the bloody hell my air support was. When the game abruptly ended (*SPOILER ALERT* with another MW2 rip-off involving the killing-off of a leading character), I was genuinely confused and waiting for the next chapter to start.
I'm not particularly interested in extending the play time with multiplayer, since I get that particular fix with MW2, so if you're like me, you'll rather wait to do a game swap with a slightly disappointed mate.