To create your free account, please enter your email address and password below. Please ensure your email is correct as you will recieve a validation email before you can login.

Confirm Password:
Weekly newsletter:
Daily newsletter:

To log in to your account, please enter your email address and password below:

Forgot your password?

To reset your password, please enter your email address below and we will send you a link to reset it.

Submitted by Gwynne Dixon on October 28 2011 - 10:06

TVG sits down with BioWare Edmonton's Studio Manager, Aaryn Flynn to discuss Mass Effect 3's multiplayer...

After sitting down to sample Mass Effect 3's multiplayer for the first time, it was hard to get a solid grasp on how it all fits together with the single-player. On the one hand it plays like an uncustomised take on the Gears of War Horde-style mode; on the other, we didn't get enough hands-on experience with the build to see how it will effect the so-called 'Galactic Readiness' factor that'll be so critical in the final battle with the Reavers. To find out more, we spoke with the Studio General Manager at BioWare Edmonton, Aaryn Flynn to talk about everything from multiplayer to the future of the Mass Effect series after this next instalment.

The six playable races – humans, Asari, Drell, Krogans, Turians, and Salarian - what do they each bring to the multiplayer table?

They each get a unique ability. Then you take that and combine that with your class-based stuff. There's a nice combination of options for players; they're very customisable – you can change skin tones, armour and stuff like that – so you get lots and lots of customisation, which was one of our goals for multiplayer.

Could you give us maybe a couple of specific examples for each race's unique powers?

We're still iterating on those; we're still finalising them so I can't comment on them exactly quite yet. We'll have more to say about that later.

One of the key features that was described when the multiplayer got announced was 'Galactic Readiness'. Are you able to go on the record about exactly how your performance in the multiplayer effects the 'Galactic Readiness' in the single-player?

'Galactic Readiness' is just this idea; it's the number or the metric that's unifying a lot of the games under the 'Galaxy at War' system. The idea is that as you're playing lots of single-player and multiplayer, all of those things are affecting the 'Galaxy at War' of the galaxy. It's the 'Galactic Readiness' that then helps you unlock or achieve certain things inside the components of the games themselves.

It sounds like you're tying a lot of this into the final battle with the Reapers...

That's right, yeah.

And how much armoury and support you can bring with you in the final showdown.

All sorts of things are affected by it. Yeah, so one of the ideas behind the 'Galactic Readiness' as well is that the scores you can achieve in it are achievable singularly, so you don't have to play multiplayer and you can only play single-player if you want to. It just provides you with more options for play; it gives you more things you can do.

Obviously in the press releases, BioWare has said that it's always wanted to add multiplayer to Mass Effect, but is there pressure these days with what would have traditionally been a single-player series to have multiplayer as well?

We don't get any pressure inside EA – EA has been really good to us and very supportive to a lot of the things we've wanted to do. For us it really came down to multiplayer being a new one to try and experiment with, and we had the right story inside Mass Effect 3 of an entire galaxy at war to fit it all together. That was really important to us, that we did the multiplayer justice with a really good setting; a really good environment to do it in, but at the same time we also had the time to do the single-player right, so we had that aspect as well.

Will you be releasing DLC for the multiplayer?

Yeah, I think we're going to announce that as we get a little closer to the launch and stuff, but we're assessing that right now – what our options are as we get closer to launch.

The maps I've played through almost feel like skirmish maps really – how much can the multiplayer bring to the third game in terms of plot?

There are lots of little different adventures you can do inside the multiplayer. They're all focussed on Horde-style gameplay, so in terms of how it effects the plot: just little story elements that are scattered throughout it and stuff, and you'll get a sense of what else is going inside this galaxy of war beyond just what you're learning in the single-player campaign.

And you mentioned Horde – just playing the map demoed here today, it does feel a lot like that Gears of War style with an enclosed map and enemy waves. Is that the case throughout all the modes and maps in the multiplayer?

Yeah, every map is really meant to accentuate something a little bit different; something a little bit unique, to find different enemies that are randomised through it and stuff. So we're trying to change it up a little bit and give people the chance to try different things. People have their favourites...

I was thinking the other day about why this wave-based co-op has become so popular these days. Is it because the technology has opened up to make it easier to do, or is it more of a fad?

Yeah, I think there are technology reasons for it. In fact you can do one map really, really well – let's iterate on it – things like that. There are networking latency things – people are never so far apart so you're not having to hold it all together. Yeah, I think that's fair to say.

So you guys are out in March?

Yep, March 6th in North America and March 9th in the EU.

And there's definitely not going to be any more Mass Effect after this one? This is the last one for sure?

I don't know about that...

PR handler:'s the end of Shepard's story.

So the trilogy was originally conceived to end with Mass Effect 3...

Obviously, yeah...

But whether we make any more Mass Effect games in the future, that's still to be determined.

Cliff Bleszinski has talked about doing a 'The Hobbit' Gears of War now that the trilogy is finished – would you be tempted to do a Mass Effect 'The Hobbit'?

I don't know. I think just get this one done and then let everybody take a breather. Let's open our minds to new ideas and if there's a good idea there then we'll support it.

We've rated your previous games highly – Mass Effect has emerged as one of the seminal RPG series of this generation. Obviously the mix of RPG gameplay and shooter combat is one of the big reasons for this success. Is there still space for traditional RPGs as we move into the next generation?

Um, yeah... I mean it depends what you mean by traditional RPG. Those are both relatively loaded terms – people might have their own definition of both those terms. Based on what I think are traditional RPGs, I think there's room for it. I think what's interesting to me is to see how many 'traditional RPG elements' are being used in other games right now. I find that very interesting, so for me one of the things I look forward to is what interesting things are other games doing that we can pull into our genre.

As regards that, what other areas compel you? You've done the combat thing – where next?

I think multiplayer has been done more in other genres lately, and I think doing a good with it in Mass Effect 3 – I hope people enjoy it. Yeah, that's what I think right now.

TVG would like to thank Aaryn Flynn, the Studio General Manager at BioWare Edmonton for taking the time to speak with us. Mass Effect 3 is due out on March 9th in Europe and March 6th in North America for the Xbox 360, PS3, and PC...

If you wish to link to this article, here's a permalink to this page:

TVG Store - Finding you the cheapest price for:

Mass Effect 3


Sign Up and Post with a Profile

Join TVG for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member. You can still post anonymously.

Log in using Facebook

Respect Other Members

Please respect other users, post wisely and avoid flaming... Terms & Conditions


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Fri 28th Oct 2011 12:07, Post No: 10

i can't see what the problem is from what Bioware have been saying they opened up a brand new studio just to build the Multiplayer mode, clearly done so the devs working on the single player mode can focus on the single player mode without the distraction. Have a bit of faith it might be worth it

By: freeradical

Added:Fri 28th Oct 2011 11:46, Post No: 9

@Post 8: Thanks for the corrections - I've ammended the article. Got mixed up with Firefly on Reavers - typo on Drell.

User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Fri 28th Oct 2011 11:14, Post No: 8

Haha... I'm pretty sure that they're called "Reapers" and not "Reavers"

Also "Drell" not "Droll"

User avatar
By: Kiran255

Added:Fri 08th Apr 2011 12:49, Post No: 7

I dunno. I always used to wish Ocarine of Time had a multiplayer mode.

User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Tue 08th Jun 2010 03:16, Post No: 6

i agree to most of the comments here

mp will ruin this franchise and only pure shooters should have

i mean the cod series would be terrible without any mp but to add it to a great sp experience is a stupid thing to do

most hardcore ME players prob wont buy this if mp was in it, i for one wont if it ends up with mp

By: freeradical

Added:Tue 01st Jun 2010 17:35, Post No: 5

Have you ever checked the lobbies of a mediocre multiplayer game a few months after its release? They're usually completely dead.

If a developer isn't going to make multiplayer the focus, then it seems like it's just a waste of resources to tack-on a bland multiplayer experience.

Exactly how deep can multiplayer modes go for an RPG series that's so strongly focussed on story? Not deep enough for my liking...

User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Tue 01st Jun 2010 17:19, Post No: 4

@gfh-77 - Using CoD as an example saying that it adds a more lasting appeal is like saying would you like WoW without multiplayer. That's basically all the CoD games are. The single player on them is just a generic run and gun game (I mean, 7 hours end-to-end on MW2 on Veteran is just pathetic as a single player game). 

It's not about lasting appeal. That's what DLC is for. No, adding multiplayer to everything wouldn't add lasting appeal. You needa realize that it's a rarity for a game to have a good single player and multiplayer. One of the modes ends up being completely half-assed. So, on a game like Mass Effect (my favorite video game series to date), I'd rather see the money they were going to use to do this multiplayer being put in to something to improve the single player than put some random multiplayer mode on to the game that just drags it all down. 

And one last word on 'lasting appeal' - I've played both ME games through at least 3 times and I've bought every single piece of DLC for ME2 that's been released. I've never once wished for multiplayer to make me keep playing it.

As for paying for live, I didn't say multiplayer shouldn't be in some games; I'm saying don't include it in every single game for reason, rather than tack it on and it be complete crap. 

By: SegaBoy

Added:Tue 01st Jun 2010 14:08, Post No: 3

I think it's pretty sad when great single-player games have to jump on the bandwagon - purely for the sake of it.

There's no doubt multiplayer is a money thing for the publishers; it's the easiest wayto keep churning out DLC and keep gamers attached to the product.

That said - if it's done well I'm not going to complain.

By: gfh-77

Added:Tue 01st Jun 2010 13:30, Post No: 2

if multiplayer realy ruins games then would you just love to see call of duty not include a multiplayer mode, no offence but multiplayer just adds more lasting appeal to any game (how many people would love to see a multiplayer mode on just cause 2).


all thats needed is to use a few more disks (if more space is required then make use of it especially on the 360) as for bioshock 2 not having multiplayer might have been worse (once completed youll have nothing left to do thats why multiplayer is included in more games) besides whats the point in paying for xbox live if you dont want multiplayer included in certain games.

User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Tue 01st Jun 2010 12:50, Post No: 1

FFS, where do devs feel the need to include multiplayer on every single game? Bioshock 2 would have been way better if it had stayed single player, and now BioWare are feeling the need to ruin the best franchise/game universe there has been in the past decade! Just keep things single player, they sold fantastically, both critics and players LOVED them... why change that for some tacked on bullsh*t multiplayer mode?