To create your free account, please enter your email address and password below. Please ensure your email is correct as you will recieve a validation email before you can login.

Email:
Nickname:
Password:
Confirm Password:
Weekly newsletter:
Daily newsletter:

To log in to your account, please enter your email address and password below:

Email:
Password:
Forgot your password?

To reset your password, please enter your email address below and we will send you a link to reset it.

Email:
Submitted by Gwynne Dixon on November 8 2011 - 12:25

In a console generation of trilogy conclusions, we find out whether Modern Warfare 3 is the high point...

And so, what started off with a mission in the Bering Sea to investigate suspicious freight aboard a cargo ship has ultimately culminated in World War III. This is how far we've come from the start of the original Modern Warfare to the preface of this third instalment. There have been two nuclear explosions, the deaths/killings of all four of the game's 'Horsemen of the Apocalypse', one particularly memorable jaunt in an AC-130 gunship, ballistic missiles fired upon the continental United States, a full-scale air and land invasion of Washington DC, and more air miles racked-up by Task Force 141's jet-setting lifestyle than Judith Chalmers managed in her entire career on Wish You Were Here. Truly, it's been one hell of a ride and it's not about to stop now – Modern Warfare 3 takes all of that as its launchpad really, from which it delves into Russian invasions across the world's major capital cities.

New York, London, Paris, Berlin – all of them get the apocalyptic treatment complete with toppled skyscrapers, Russian hunter-killer subs in their rivers, stock exchanges in bits, and at least one iconic monument collapsing in a manner all too reminiscent of Team America. It's off-the-hook action that segues from one memorable set-piece to another with seamless, breakneck speed. Underneath all of this, though, the surviving members of Task Force 141 (now a disavowed group of mercenaries), Soap MacTavish and Captain Price (+1 FNG, Yuri), return to their under-the-radar operations that sway the balance of global power through microcosmic incisions as sharp as a Katana sword and effective as nerve gas. This is the kind of stuff we'd been looking forward to – not the ludicrous notion of a Russian invasion force actually managing to travel across continental Europe and reach its major capitals relatively unopposed, but the much more conceivable prospect of clandestine special ops putting a well placed spanner in the works and neutering the bad guys. Thankfully, MW3 has plenty of this, which is made all the more of a relief following MW2's relatively sparse offerings in this area.

Price and MacTavish et al. flick-flack across the globe once again from locations as far afield as Sierra Leone and the Czech Republic, no doubt costing their few remaining benefactors a small fortune in expenses. They're still incredible characters too – it may be the most popular game series in the world that's inevitably reached annoying levels of ubiquitousness as a result but, standing aside from this, Soap and Price are among the most memorable videogame characters in any first-person shooter, ever. Outside the iconic silent protagonists like Gordon Freeman and the Master Chief, FPS characters don't get any better than these former SAS soldiers and Modern Warfare 3 arguably depicts them in as flattering a light as either of the two games in the trilogy. And without dropping any spoilers, a trilogy is precisely what it is. That's not to say that Modern Warfare's characters won't return, but just to say that all of the series' various plot threads are tied up to the point that you'd have to start a whole new story arc in any further sequels.

Anybody expecting something extra special for this trilogy book-ender may well come away slightly disappointed though. Aside from the steroid-injected WWIII action, Modern Warfare 3's gameplay blueprint adheres to the rigidity of its predecessors. Through sniper sections, set-pieces, vehicle missions, and overclocked fire-fights to which any Modern Warfare veteran could set their clock by now, and the traditional campaign length of 6-7 hours, it all pangs of the tried-and-tested Modern Warfare formula that's become so entrenched since 2007. Infinity Ward's long-enduring game engine – which some commentators have accused of being outdated in the Frostbite 2 era – remains as rock-solid as ever though, and even boasts evidence of improved destructibility at times (although admittedly that evidence is fleeting and often scripted). Almost like an old friend, the studio clearly knows the strengths and limitations of its engine down to a tee. Blocky, low-res textures can be found on the periphery of any MW environment, but it's the way that Infinity Ward consistently manages to cast your eye away from this by lavishing all its processing power on the centre-pieces that's so impressive. Bringing Sledgehammer Games on-board to help with the single-player component post-West/Zampellagate clearly hasn't diluted the overall vision either – without the Sledgehammer names on the credits, you'd just as easily assume that it was business as usual.

Next, multiplayer...

If you wish to link to this article, here's a permalink to this page:

  • Graphics: 92%
     
  • Sound: 96%
     
  • Gameplay: 93%
     
  • Originality: 79%
     
  • Longevity: 92%
     
Overall Score: 9/10
In a single-player campaign that goes a bit over-the-top at times, it's a relief to see that the action is scaled-back with Soap and Price often enough to ensure that these characters receive the billing they deserve. Elsewhere in the multiplayer, Infinity Ward was always going to have a hard time replicating the impact of its package from two years ago but it's managed a rock-solid, if slightly conservative offering for this difficult third album in the Modern Warfare series.

Comment

Sign Up and Post with a Profile

Join TVG for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member. You can still post anonymously.

Log in using Facebook

Respect Other Members

Please respect other users, post wisely and avoid flaming... Terms & Conditions

 

Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Fri 02nd Dec 2011 04:49, Post No: 22

yes post 20 you sure are an idiot, what tech happens to be inside your games console !, ill tell you it's PC tech thats over 6 years out of date, your graphics are past it and your CPU cant handle true 1080p native game resolution without serious comprimise, like it of lump it your consoles are old and crusty and there holding back game development FACT.


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Fri 02nd Dec 2011 04:49, Post No: 21

yes post 20 you sure are an idiot, what tech happens to be inside your games console !, ill tell you it's PC tech thats over 6 years out of date, your graphics are past it and your CPU can handle true 1080p native game resolution without serious comprimise, like it of lump it your consoles are old and crusty and there holding back game development FACT.


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Sat 12th Nov 2011 16:03, Post No: 20

idiot


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Wed 09th Nov 2011 22:10, Post No: 19

1 simple fact a lot of you will disagree on but know its the truth, if these game's were purely and simply exclusivly only on PC they would not be as bad as they are right now. consoles restrict content, restrict MP modes texture res ect basicly if you really wanted to see these games evolve you should stop playing on games consoles and play on gaming PC's, its console gamers who are stopping these games from there evolutional cycle. pc's recieve upgrades every day and evolve every year while console slow this process down considerably and this gen has to end now, by keeping this gen as it is you wont see any noticable change in gaming franchise's and COD is a prime example of this. BattleField 3 on the PC using current gen graphics cards among other current and upto date components makes the games look and feel leauges better than the console's, basicly while the PC is in the premier legue both the 360 and ps3 and in a regional conferance miles away from last devision let alone the prem (if you understand english football you'll kinda grasp what im getting at) basicly the consoles are past their sell by date and now there just old and crusty, for games like COD and BF to pregress and evolve we need the next gen consoles now not in 2 or 3 years time, in fact for all games to evolve we need the next gen of consoles. the PC already has the next gen but is constantly being held back i just with not only console gamer accept this true fact but also sony and microsoft too, nintendo are/have done somthing about it and its about time sony and microsoft did too. yours the antagonised PC gamer.


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Wed 09th Nov 2011 04:07, Post No: 18

The graphics are ugly and the sound is terrible.


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Wed 09th Nov 2011 02:42, Post No: 17

Sound 96%? Sound has improved but it still sounds like I have sponges in my ears.


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Wed 09th Nov 2011 01:30, Post No: 16

Im freeradical and I think I'm cool


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Wed 31st Aug 2011 00:56, Post No: 15

@ Post13:
I second that! LOL


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Wed 31st Aug 2011 00:55, Post No: 14

@Post 13: Agreed.

 


User avatar
By: Anonymous

Added:Wed 31st Aug 2011 00:32, Post No: 13

Freeradical is G**


Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next